New Location! CRFF

So for those who do not know, I am now on the staff of OSU's SportsNation blog affiliate Cowboys Ride for Free. I expect to do an offensive recap after every game and maybe some opponent's scouting reports when conference play begins. If you want to check me out there, along with all of the other great writers, go to the website below:

www.cowboysrideforfree.com

I may or may not continue blogging on this site, depending on public feedback. I would still check every once and a while to see if anything new is up. Until then, make sure you subscribe to crff and make it your new favorite website!

Oklahoma St vs Florida St: The Frustration Continues..

The Oklahoma State Cowboys fell short Saturday, as they lost a squeaker to reigning national champion Florida State. Their offensive game-plan was eerily similar to their game vs. Missouri, and while a change in offensive philosophy might be too much to ask for at this point, there are certain things that could improve the Pokes' offensive efficiency. They might have scored 31 points, but we can all agree that there were some wasted drives and missed opportunities.

Note:
 I really wasn't planning to make more of these, but after the success of the blog last year (2,700+ views), hopefully someone will take a look at it. Additionally, I felt that this stuff deserved to be heard; think of this as food for thought, if nothing else.

Think of my articles as the "Captain Hindsight" of OSU football
picture credit blogredmachine.com

Obviously, it should be addressed to how vanilla OSU's offense has been. Granted, the offensive line probably limited the playbook, but if the play-calling isn't going to become more diverse, there are still things that they can do to help the offense succeed.

Looking back to last year along with this first game, the Cowboys' game-plan has consisted of trying to run it down the defense's throats instead of using their perimeter speed. Take Tyreek Hill, for example, who has already proved himself as an electric player. He is not going to be as successful used as a bruiser, constantly going up the middle. You need to get that player in open space, and you can accomplish that in ways other than inside runs and swing passes.

On the same subject, Oklahoma State's new favorite play, the wham play, is extremely limited in outcome. They also run it a lot. It would probably be safe to say that they ran the wham play 20-25 times, many with the same ol' 1-2 yard result.  They did occasionally have a solid gain from this play, thanks to Tyreek, but it's important to remember the definition of insanity. This was the same issue last year; they would seemingly waste a down getting stuffed between the tackles and the drive usually ended in a long, unconverted third down.



Here's why they had their struggles-


There were so many times when OSU got caught in a bad play but didn't have either the time or the proper in-formation audibles to change things.

This is Oklahoma State's base wham play; it's an inside zone with the play-side end being blocked by the "buck" (Y - usually TE Jeremy Seaton).  Florida State frequently had the nickel-back come into the box, leaving the slot receiver uncovered. OSU was now stuck in a play where they had six blockers on seven defenders, and the play did not have any flexibility to take advantage of the uncovered slot defender. This can be fixed. 

Take a look at the play above. Many spread teams are starting to add tag routes within their running plays. This is an example of a play that you might see an Oregon, Baylor, or Arizona run. The backside "X" receiver is running a quick curl, and the slot receiver is running a bubble. It's the quarterback's decision to decide where the ball goes. If the backside corner rolls off of the "X" receiver, the quarterback can take the snap and throw quickly to him. If the nickel-back comes into the box or shows blitz, the quarterback can take the snap and throw quickly to the uncovered receiver. If OSU is going to stick to running the same play over and over again, at least give it a little flexibility. 

To watch a similar concept in action, take a look at smartfootball's video of Ole Miss here

If you watched the video above, you'll notice that the Rebels called the same play five times in a row, each play giving a different result. Packaged plays used to be a huge part of the OSU offense. Now, they're used only occasionally. This is directly opposed to a team like Baylor, who has a pas option in every single one of their plays.

The second thing that we look out now is their wham keep play. If you remember the MSU game from last year, this play alone carried the Cowboys to victory. 

They did not use the quarterback much off of any zone reads (similar to the Cotton Bowl), but the one time they tried this play, a big mistake was made. So, if you're not using this play with any regularity, then you should be able to diversify it slightly and classify it as a short-yardage package. This could allow you to have a slightly more unorthodox formation or concept since you'd only run it a handful of times.

 When OSU ran this play in the crucial moments of the fourth quarter, the play-side receiver (Jhajhuan Seales) blew his block, allowing his corner to come up and force a fumble on JW Walsh. If you're only using the quarterback keep as a wrinkle and not as a true cornerstone of the offense, then why not go to measures that, in theory, would prevent these mistakes from happening.

The first option is to move that receiver to the other side. Michigan occasionally used this formation as a quarterback run package. Although this makes the innermost receiver ineligible, it still brings that corner to the other side, theoretically opening space on one side of the formation. Again, if you're only going to run this play a handful of times, then it's okay to use a formation like this where any potential pass play is limited.

The second option is to tell the play-side receiver to run to open space. Similar to the first play we talked about, a route paired with a run play can take advantage of defenders who get out of place. If the defense is in man, he will take his corner upfield, leaving open space for the quarterback. If the defense is caught in zone, the quarterback should have a wide-open receiver on the sideline. Auburn has used this "go" concept, much to their success. 

example 1

the corner is caught in a blitz and the quarterback throws to the uncovered receiver.

Click here if gif isn't working

example 2

The corner sees the run and crashes towards the quarterback, leaving his man uncovered.

Click here if the gif isn't working

At the end of the day, it's still impressive to say that they scored 31 on the #1 team in the nation. Let's hope that the Cowboys can make some adjustments before conference-play begins. If their offense can become more consistent, the sky is the limit.

-TGF

The Option, Reinvented pt.1

Today, we'll take a short look at how the option has been reshaped in today's modern game. In this post, we will visit a new form of the triple option, coined by former U of Florida HC Urban Meyer.

THE SHOVEL OPTION

By Definition, a shovel pass is when a quarterback pitches the ball to a player in front of him behind the line of scrimmage; since the ball is going forward, it is considered a pass and not a run. The name of this flicking motion has long been disputed, with many people using the terms shovel, shuffle, and scuttle. You say potatoes, I say potahtos, either way it doesn't matter. The shovel was often used as a variation of a draw for a long period of time until Mr. Meyer made it a staple of the option game.


 Just for reference purposes, this is your basic shotgun triple option out of the split

This, on the other hand, is the shotgun shovel option


Notice, instead of having a mesh for the inside option (see B back in upper picture), there is an inside shovel threat with the trailing tight end. The back adjacent to the quarterback then provides the pitch threat, creating a true triple option look.

After Meyer's stint at Bowling Green and Utah, he brought his innovation to the SEC; lucky for him, he had a 240lb bowling ball at quarterback.

Former Gator quarterback Tim Tebow became a superstar perfecting plays like this, leading his team to two national championship games. Unfortunately, his professional career was short-lived, possibly because the ball hit the turf as many times as his receivers (48% career completion percentage). Still, he is considered one of the top college quarterbacks in FBS history, and for good reason.

Here, the defensive end followed Tebow laterally, which left Aaron Hernandez wide open to bullet (pun intended) towards the end zone.

The idea of the shovel has since been tinkered with, substituting pitches with pass patterns, adding pre-snap screens, isolation routes, etc.

Here's using the shovel in the empty formation, using a play-side bubble to take place of a pitch. This variation spreads out the defense; sometimes the most effective running formations are spread out like this. 

This play uses a pre-snap read to the right hash and two post-snap reads to the left hash. If you don't know what that means, look at some of the previous posts. 

Well that's it for today. Maybe later we can explore some other aspects of Florida's (once) juggernaut offense another time. Until then, eat, drink, and be merry. Or be married. Tomato, tomahto.

Package Plays in All Forms pt.3a

In the past week or two, we have been taking a look at how specific teams use advanced concepts to move the football and score points. These advanced concepts, specifically package plays, have been all the rage in the college football world. Today, this post will continue on that path. This is the third part in the Package Play series, with the third post being divided into two subparts - this is the first.
ARIZONA STATE/ UCLA - Into the Mind of Noel Mazzone

Last post, we took a look at how Rich Rodriguez used a predominately zone-based running scheme and an outside passing threat to enhance the effectiveness of his offense. Today, we will take a look at one of the lesser-known offensive geniuses of the football world - Noel Mazzone.

Mazzone, who after a two year stint at Arizona State, took the offensive coordinator job at UCLA in 2012. Immediately the year he was hired, the Bruins increased their PPG average by roughly two touchdowns and their YPG by about 90 yards. Mazzone uses a similar scheme to Rodriguez', but includes a lot more pre-snap motion with his backs and receivers. If you haven't already read the piece on Rich Rodriguez, take a look at the post below.

This scheme above is a common play in college football, with an inside zone and an outside screen threat.

Mazzone uses motion to accomplish the same thing. Here, the left slot receiver runs across the formation before the snap and runs a swing towards the sideline. This gives the quarterback an opportunity to read the defense and observe their coverage. If the corner on the motion-man stays put and does not run with the receiver before the snap, this gives the quarterback a 3-on-2 advantage, leaving the swing route wide open (provided that the receivers all block). If the corner follows the receiver in motion, the quarterback then keeps the advantage in the box, with 5-on-5 (or with a zone read, 5-on-4). 

Here's another example of using a motion into the backfield opposed to a motion across the formation.

In this example, the "Z" receiver runs in motion behind the formation and both the offensive line and the back execute a variation of the buck sweep to the side opposite of the motion. This is a very similar scheme to the one above. If the corner on the motion receiver stays put, the quarterback throws to swinging receiver (since he has a 3-on-2 advantage). No one follows the receiver in the gif below, but the defense shifts along with the motion, putting three defenders on the right side and therefore nullifying that option. The quarterback then makes the correct decision by handing the ball off.

Mazzone doesn't only use motions - he also uses the same concepts without motions, giving him an opportunity to go at a quicker pace. 

Here's an example of the inside zone and bubble:

corner directly on the inside slot receiver (although he blitzes after the snap); leads to handoff

ASU goes no-huddle, USC forces to repeat the same defensive coverage. Osweiler quickly throws the ball to the outside, knowing that the corner is blitzing like the play before.

In the next post, we will look at Mazzone's signature package, on top of exploring the popular play-calling strategies of a successful offensive coordinator. For any extra coverage on what we've talked about today, or to learn more about the modern spread offense, go to www.fishduck.com. This Oregon beat website has great scouting reports on opposing teams in the Pac-12, along with coverage on the Ducks.